By Jake Thomas, Staff Writer
The Great Recession
began nearly five years ago. Since then, economists and the media have produced
a string of graphs, as well as employment and financial data that show that the
economy has made a sluggish, yet, clear march toward recovery. But what is
often absent from this tepidly optimistic picture are all the people who
weren’t lifted up by the recovery, who never quite saw the recession end and
never stopped worrying.
Harry and Joe
Gantz, two Emmy Award-winning filmmakers best known for capturing life in
action in the documentary series “Taxicab Confessions” and the documentary film
“Sex with Strangers” as well as others, present an intimate portrait of eight
Portland families left behind by the recovery in “American Winter.” The film,
which played during the Portland International Film Festival and premiers March
18 on HBO, captures candid moments in the lives of families who seem to live in
a state of perpetual dread as they drift from crisis to crisis, worrying about
how to keep the electricity on, how to pay for housing and the toll their
new-found poverty is taking on their kids.
The Gantz brothers
selected Portland for the film’s setting, where they used 211Info, a hotline
that refers people in need to social services, to find the families whose lives
they document in revealing detail. Portland caught their eye because, unlike
Los Angeles or New York, it wasn’t the obvious place to tap into hard times.
Nonetheless, it provided a bounty of stories of a lost American dream.
Jake Thomas: Why did you select the title “American
Joe Gantz: Well, you’ll remember that the Arab Spring
was a time of unlimited potential, a time of awakening and change in a positive
direction. It kind of occurred to us that at this time of need, when so many
families were losing homes and losing jobs and tremendously in need of some
form of assistance, we, as a country, were focusing on cutting budgets and
cutting services and not looking at the human side of the equation. So it felt
like the potential of this country was being lost a little. We felt like this
is an American Winter that will hopefully be followed by an American Spring.
Harry Gantz: The point is that we want people to see a
little of themselves in there. Everybody knows someone who lost a job.
Everybody knows someone who was foreclosed on or is at threat of being
foreclosed on. So this is a unique time with large new populations of poor. The
formerly middle class have fallen into poverty, and it’s happening at the same
time previous cuts to social serves will just make it a perfect storm. These
social workers you see in the film are having to do so much more with so much
J.T.: Did anything surprise you? Was there
anything that was unexpected?
Joe: I think the thing that struck me first and
most powerfully was to watch families who were dealing with this kind of stress
on a daily basis, on an hourly basis, that goes with not having enough to meet
the needs of your family, to be continually worried about losing your
electricity or your heat or the lease on your house, of being evicted or not
having enough food. Being a parent in the worst-case scenario, you don’t want
to transmit that sense of panic and dread to your kid, but, on the other hand,
you don’t want to lie to them completely. And these parents are just so
overwhelmed by this. It’s not a way to live. It’s traumatizing to the entire
I personally think
that having watched that in making this film and lived so close to them as they
were going through it that it has long-term effects on families and on kids.
Kids who go through this in the U.S. will not do well in school, they will not
be able to fulfill their potential or will often be traumatized to the point
where they don’t finish high school or don’t finish college and don’t become
the members of society that we expect and hope for, but they’ll be so
traumatized that they become a burden on society.
J.T.: Where would you say our social safety net
is most vulnerable, if anywhere?
Joe: That’s a tough question. I’d like to come
at it slightly differently. A lot of people that we worked with spoke about how
it’s so hard to get help and you have to go through so many hoops. You have to
call into 211 at the right time at the month for some services. And then if you
do get a job and make a little more money, they take away your housing
assistance or food stamps so you’re put back to the point where you are stuck
at the very edge. The goal should be to get people on their feet and live a life
that’s comfortable. And I don’t mean cushy. I mean you don’t spend every minute
of every day on how you’re going to keep your head above water.
Harry: A lot of people are frustrated with social
services, but put yourself in their position where they got into this to help
people and you have more people needing your help, and there are cuts to
resources for people needing your help and there are fewer resources.
Joe: Commissioner Nick Fish said in the film
that it’s cheaper by far to help people before they completely fall through the
safety net and become homeless. Our experience has been that the vast majority
of people we talked to and followed in Portland was that they worked their
entire life, they wanted nothing more than to get off of social services as
fast as they could and they just wanted a means to support their family and the
amount of support they got was not enough. If they did get a job that kind of
got them ahead a little bit, but they were faced with a corresponding cut to
their housing help of food stamps.
making this documentary do you think America is a fair place?
Joe: [Pause] Fair place meaning everyone has a
shot to succeed?
Joe: No, I don’t really think so. The statistics
in this film that show that poverty is growing and the predictor if you’ll get
ahead in this country and succeed is most often determined by the wealth of
your family. There are all kinds of reasons when we ask people who were
struggling if they felt they had a shot at the American dream. Most of the kids
as well as the adults said they really didn’t feel like that was their reality.
J.T.: You got some great material for this
documentary, some really candid moments. I was wondering how you found these
families and developed a rapport with them.
Joe: That is our speciality, capturing life in
progress, and we just spent a lot of time. You try to establish a rapport and
you fade into the background and let their life go on as if you’re not there.
We never tried to influence that in any way, and when we’re filming these
things we try to be a fly on the wall as much as we can, and, in time, people
warm up, and they go back to being themselves.
There’s a lot of
shame in being poor and needing social services, so we were asking them to open
up completely for us.
Harry: The kids even spoke to the shame by not
telling their friends where they live. I see a 40-year movement in the media
starting with the Reagan administration to demonize people who receive social
services, with the welfare queen and the 47 percent and we found the opposite
to be true. Sure, there’s some fraud in the system, but the majority of people
there are because of some unforeseen circumstances. They want to work. They
want to support their family. They want the dignity of a job. The stereotype is
very different, and you can find that, but after listening in on thousands of
phone calls and visiting with hundreds of families you find that’s not the
J.T.: Are there any moments in making the film
that haunt you or resonate with you?
Joe: There were a lot of moments. It’s extremely
hard to be with folks who are going through very difficult times, including not
having enough to eat. You’re with a film crew and you know when you break
you’re going to go with the crew and get a meal, and you’re going to go back in
a comfortable environment, and they are in danger of losing their electricity.
It was difficult to be part of the film in that respect.
We made a trailer of the film, and in the trailer we paid the people at
the end of the day. We paid them what we considered not a lot of money ... But
what we didn’t realize is that they were so desperate that the amount of money
we were giving them was changing their situation totally. So when we decided we
were done shooting then we paid them. It was just very hard.